IF WOMEN RULED THE WORLD, HOW WOULD I KNOW THE DIFFERENCE?
I heard
that former Clinton White House press secretary Dee Dee Myers was coming
to Atlanta to keynote a conference with an eye-glazing title: “Possible
Woman Conference: Power, Promise and Possibilities,” to take place April
21 at the Georgia World Congress Center.
The proposed subject of her talk intrigued me:
“Why Women Should Rule the World.” Dumb me. I thought women already did.
For most
of my adult life I have taken directives from the Woman Who Shares My
Name, my daughter and my daughter-in-law. If that was not intimidating
enough, I now have a granddaughter-in-law who has joined the junta.
I have
heard from readers suggesting that I run for governor and straighten out
that crowd under the Gold Dome. One person even wrote that I should
“take over state government.” That is very flattering, but the truth is
that if I am not in charge of my own house, how can I be in charge of
government? (“Your Eminence, You-Know-Who just called and said to eat
your broccoli and turn down the sound on the television. You always play
the TV so loud, people in the next county can hear it.”) Who wants a
leader who needs to be told things like that?
In a telephone call to Dee Dee Myers at her home
base in Washington, I told her she was a little late on that “ruling the
world” stuff at the Yarbrough household. She laughed and said she really
is not advocating an overthrow of us guys. She just wants us to share
the territory a little more.
“Although,” she quips, “after what you men did to the economy, maybe we
should take over.” Ouch!
Myers,
who was the first woman — and the youngest person — to hold the job of
White House press secretary, believes that women bring unique strengths
to the workplace.
Unlike men — who over the eons developed a
kill-or-be-killed mentality in which the guy with the biggest club and
fastest reflexes usually won — women, Myers says, developed a totally
different set of skills: reading nonverbal cues, carefully assessing
their environment and seeking peaceful ways of resolving issues. Not
only did their lives depend on their success, but so did the lives of
their offspring.
“These
are skill sets,” she says, “that serve women well today.”
Myers
says women are making progress in reaching their potential, but “we
still have far to go.” She points to medicine and science as two fields
where women are currently excelling, based on those things she says
women do best: listening, analyzing and empathizing. Another advantage,
she says, is that women tend to look at problems differently than men
and seek new ideas, rather than embrace the old way of doing things.
Myers believes one of the issues that women need
to confront is not the attitude of their male counterparts but those of
other women.
“Frankly,” she asserts, “women tend to be too
judgmental of each other.” Myers says some women in the workforce look
down on those who choose to stay home as being stereotypes of another
era. Many stay-at-home women think those who are focused on climbing the
ladder of success minimize the importance of family. It does not have to
be an either-or situation, she says. Women should be able to do both.
Myers is
a good example. She is a wife and the mother of two, who gives her
daughter’s soccer practice the same energy and effort that she does
women’s issues. Besides, she says, raising children requires many of the
same skills needed in the workplace. Having worked with some very
infantile people in my time, I would agree.
I’m glad
I called her, and I’m glad I found out she doesn’t want women to take
over the world but to be appreciated for the variety of talents they
bring to the workplace. However, after talking to Dee Dee Myers, I would
be happy to have her in charge. She is sharper than a carving knife and
would certainly do a better job of running things than that nutcase in
Iran or the fat toad in North Korea. Maybe I could even convince her to
ban broccoli.
Download Printer-Friendly Version Here
((Must have Acrobat Reader
installed... click
here
for a free download!